Ron Hill is one of the most accomplished runners living, and I, for one, wouldn’t think any less of him if he takes the day off.
It is a most remarkable and curious thing that the 76-year-old Hill, who won major marathons, set world records, and invented the most comfortable running pants the world has ever seen, might be best known as the bloke who hasn’t missed a day of running in 50 years. On December 20th, he logged a run of at least a mile for the 18,261st straight day (assuming I counted the leap years properly). He began his current streak in December 1964, and five decades and 160,000 miles later, he’s still hanging in there. I actually wrote about his streak several years ago when he hit 150,000 miles. Now the milestones keep coming, and really, what more is there to write?
He’s already shown that he is willing to run with broken bones, on crutches, and with any number of other afflictions that might make the rest of us pause before heading out the door. He’s answered all the possible questions about his sanity and judgement by basically ignoring those questions, outlasting them, you might say. When someone questions the wisdom of a practice, there’s nothing like living to a healthy old age to silence the doubters.
But the question that arises in my mind is what now? Do you bring the streak to an end with a planned gesture, a big send off, a la The Colbert Report? Or do you just keep logging those daily runs until one day it slips your mind? And then, do you sheepishly call up the local news and tell them it’s over, or do you never mention it, until the reporters come around for the 60th year in a row, and only then do you disappoint them. “Streak? What are you on about? That ended YEARS ago.”
On the other hand, why would he want to stop? The man clearly enjoys running. At least I hope he does. Somehow the thought that he might have been been keeping the streak alive even though it had become tedious for him would be profoundly disappointing. I like to think that what’s kept him going all these years is as simple as thinking that a day with a run is better than a day without, no matter what. If instead all of this consistency has been out of a sense of obligation, then really what’s the point?
Ron Hill can do what he wants, of course. If he feels like running tomorrow and the next day and the next, he’s welcome. But if I were in his shoes, I’d think about skipping my run on December 31st, and then starting a new streak in January 1st. I’d want to see whether I could recapture that little flicker of excitement at realizing that I’d run for a week without a day off, and then two weeks. Out with the old streak, in with the new, as it were.
Or maybe I’d look outside and say ‘to Hell with it,’ and go for a run anyway.
Just saw your blog. Ron Hill was a great runner. But, many people do not view hobbling a mile on crutches for a mile as a run. I don’t. I guess one can define a, “run”, anyway one wants. Even excluding that one mile “run” on crutches; a great career and two great streaks; adding up to 50 years.
Oh, thanks for the blog on Alan Turing. If you compare Turing’s 2:46 to the world record of the time; it is equivalent to roughly a 2:22 today.
Thanks for reading.
Hi Tony, thanks for the visit and the comment.
One of my old running buddies, who had a five-year-running streak at the time, used to have the same reservation about Hill’s streak. My buddy had a strict rule that a run had to be at least two miles, completed in no more than 20 minutes. Arbitrary, perhaps, but at least defined. He and I would also spend hours talking about our personal “rules” for entering mileage in our running logs, for example, whether one should count the jogs in between reps during a track workout (we said no), or the warmup before a race (we said yes).
In any case, I’m glad you enjoyed the blog, and I hope to hear from you again!